Remote vs In Office – Is It Style Dependent?
The debate continues on whether to bring remote workers back to the workplace. A lot has been written about this. The remote vs in office conflict continues. It’s more than just logistics. What’s your take on this? Could work styles play a part?
The Argument for Return to Office
Leaders cite “synergy,” “creativity,” or “teamwork” as reasons they need everyone in the office. Some also suspect remote workers aren’t really working full time on their work.
Some remote workers prefer the office because:
- Distractions at home make it hard to focus.
- They need a bright line boundary between work and personal life.
- Working alone leaves them feeling isolated.
The Value of Work at Home
For others, remote work has great perks: the quick commute, the casual setting, snacks in the fridge and no distractions from co-workers. They report higher productivity and some are even quitting jobs that force them back to the office.
What’s the Role of Styles?
As I followed this debate, I realized that style difference could be a factor.
Many CEO’s are fast paced thinkers, people oriented and often creative. Those kinds of people (the “E” or “Engage” style in the T.E.A.M. framework) benefit from active engagement and value brainstorming with colleagues. They like to think out loud and want an audience to bounce off their thoughts. They get energy from engaging with others.
In contrast, people who are more analytical (the “A” or “Analyze” style), generally like to work quietly and alone. They value time and space to sort out their thoughts. Interruptions and off topic conversations are distracting to them. They excel in remote environments where they can work independently and communication via email or Slack.
What’s Your Take?
Do our work styles shape our preferences in this debate? What are your thoughts on remote vs in office? Put your comments on the post on LinkedIn or send me an email. I’ll compile the results and report on them in a future article.